News & Resources

U.S. Supreme Court Sides with Student In Disability Discrimination Case

Feb 27, 2017 | Legal Developments and News

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court enunciated a new rule regarding parents’ obligation to exhaust their administrative remedies under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) when they file suit alleging disability discrimination under other federal laws. E.F., a 13 year old with cerebral palsy, was denied permission to bring her service dog to class in a public school district in Michigan.  The school district refused the request because it had provided a one-to-one assistant as part of her individualized education program (IEP), which it believed served the same purposes the dog would have served.  The family did not dispute that the district offered a free appropriate public education (FAPE), but contended the dog was necessary to allow the student to develop independence in all settings. The family moved to a different school district which allowed the dog, and filed suit in federal court, claiming discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.  They did not pursue a due process complaint under the IDEA prior to filing suit.

The lower courts had ruled that the family had to first exhaust all administrative remedies under the IDEA before they could pursue their discrimination claim under the ADA and Section 504.  The Supreme Court vacated the ruling of the Sixth Circuit and remanded.  The Supreme Court held that the IDEA’s exhaustion requirement applies when the lawsuit seeks the only relief that is available under the IDEA—relief for the denial of a FAPE. Courts are to look at the substance, or gravamen of the complaint to determine the need for exhaustion under the IDEA, regardless of whether the complaint explicitly challenges the denial of FAPE or not.  The Supreme Court remanded for further consideration by the trial court whether exhaustion was required in this case.

We will continue to provide updates on this case as available.

RELATED POSTS

Breaking News: Federal Judge Vacates 2024 Title IX Regulations – Striking Down Title IX Changes Nationwide

  Yesterday, a federal district court in Kentucky issued a ruling striking down the 2024 “Final Rule” (i.e., the 2024 regulatory changes) in its entirety and is applicable nationwide (Link...

January 9 Day of Mourning and Implications for California Public Education

On December 29, 2024, President Biden issued a Day of Mourning Proclamation (Here) followed by an Executive Order for federal offices to close on January 9, 2025 (Here). Some school...

AB 2534 Establishes New Inquiry and Disclosure Requirements During Certificated Hiring Process Regarding Egregious Misconduct

  Beginning January 1, 2025, Assembly Bill (“AB”) 2534 requires school districts, county offices of education, charter schools, and state special schools (“LEAs”) to inquire and/or disclose information during the...