News & Resources

Failure to Post Agenda Online Due to Technical Difficulties Does Not Violate the Brown Act

Feb 1, 2016 | Legal Developments and News

Technology can help school and community college districts provide greater public access to information.  The Brown Act requires districts with websites to post meeting agendas online for 72 hours before a regular meeting.  But technology is not without its glitches, and in a recent opinion, the California Attorney General made clear that the failure of an agency to meet online posting requirements for the full 72-hour notice period due to technical difficulties with its website, did not necessarily prohibit the meeting from being held and action from being taken.  (__ Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. __ (Jan. 19, 2016, No. 14-1203).) (1)

Opinion

The Attorney General concluded that while a failure to meet the website posting requirement technically could be a violation of the Brown Act, provisions of the Brown Act uphold agency actions if the agency has “substantially complied” with agenda posting requirements. The Attorney General reasoned that the more relevant question in this situation is whether a local agency has substantially complied with the posting requirements and provided the public with adequate notice in other ways. Thus, absent facts suggesting that the public is uninformed or misinformed about the meeting, the meeting may proceed despite the failure to meet the online posting requirement.

Impact

In determining whether a meeting can still be held if technical difficulties prevent the district from posting a meeting agenda online prior to a meeting, the Attorney General suggests the relevant question is whether those looking for a meeting notice or agenda may have been misled or confused by the technical difficulties of an agency’s website.  Where the duration of the difficulties is short, and the district takes additional steps to ensure that community members are informed of the meeting, or there are other facts to suggest the risk of misinformation is low, the meeting may be held.  If there are circumstances suggesting a higher risk of misinformation or confusion about the meeting, the better course may be to reschedule the meeting.  Given the fact-specific nature of this analysis, if school and community college districts experience such difficulties it would be advisable to consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with the Brown Act.

Please contact us if we can be of assistance to you in addressing any concerns regarding complying with the Brown Act.

RELATED POSTS

Breaking News: Federal Judge Vacates 2024 Title IX Regulations – Striking Down Title IX Changes Nationwide

  Yesterday, a federal district court in Kentucky issued a ruling striking down the 2024 “Final Rule” (i.e., the 2024 regulatory changes) in its entirety and is applicable nationwide (Link...

January 9 Day of Mourning and Implications for California Public Education

On December 29, 2024, President Biden issued a Day of Mourning Proclamation (Here) followed by an Executive Order for federal offices to close on January 9, 2025 (Here). Some school...

AB 2534 Establishes New Inquiry and Disclosure Requirements During Certificated Hiring Process Regarding Egregious Misconduct

  Beginning January 1, 2025, Assembly Bill (“AB”) 2534 requires school districts, county offices of education, charter schools, and state special schools (“LEAs”) to inquire and/or disclose information during the...